Naming and Shaming

In my previous post I discussed some councillors who had raised objections to cycling exceptions on one-way streets, in spite of this having worked so effectively in other boroughs and the City of London now opening up 34 roads to contraflow cycling or two-way operation. I also highlighted one particular councillor who not only objected but gave quite a speech, in which he showed his disdain for those who ride bikes, rejecting best practice because ‘if it works in other boroughs it isn’t necessarily right for Croydon’ without giving any reason why Croydon might be different and describing the dangers of ‘cyclists hurtling the wrong way down one-way streets’.  Sadly, this was councillor Mike Fisher (Shirley), leader of Croydon Council!

That probably comes as little surprise to most of you as the dreadful conditions for cyclists on Croydon’s roads would have already suggested some powerful anti-cycling influence in the council.  Also backing objections to this simple pro-cycling measure was councillor Adam Kellett (Ashburton), a taxi driver of 25 years.  That a taxi driver could be permitted to have influence over a decision relating to cycling, or road governance at all, is utterly anti-democratic. Such biased governance is not acceptable.  He clearly has a conflict of interest on every point raised, yet you won’t see any declared.

I wrote to Mike Fisher to complain about his comments and have given him time to respond, but he has decided to remain silent. You can read the e-mail in full here.  Do you live in Ashburton or Shirley?  Did you vote for these councillors?  Is this what you voted for?